Rick Smith, founder and CEO of HyVIDA, shares how he doubled ecommerce sales year over year by finding an Amazon FBA alternative and streamlining multichannel fulfillment.
Rick Smith, founder and CEO of HyVIDA, shares how he doubled ecommerce sales year over year by finding an Amazon FBA alternative and streamlining multichannel fulfillment.
If you’re looking for Amazon FBA alternatives, you’re not alone. Amazon is one of the first places most new brands get started, and while there’s no denying the power of the exposure alone that Amazon offers, many sellers feel severely limited by Amazon’s fulfillment network.
In my experience, Amazon FBA works like a well-oiled machine, and if your products fall right into their ideal product profile — small, lightweight, “regularly” shaped, and without any unique handling requirements — it’s hard to cost-justify using any other fulfillment method to stay within Prime requirements. However, if your product doesn’t fall precisely within that product profile, or if you want more control over your inventory and branding, Amazon FBA could be seriously hindering your growth.
A little over a year into launching our hydrogen water brand, HyVIDA, that’s exactly where we found ourselves. We knew we had a product that people loved, with customer reorder rates at double the industry average. However, the restraints put on us by FBA were keeping us from expanding our SKU profile to meet new customers and complicating our multichannel fulfillment process across our more profitable channels. That’s when we made a bold decision — one that may surprise a lot of Amazon sellers. We dropped our Amazon Prime badge and switched to Amazon Fulfillment by Merchant (FBM).
There were several reasons we made the switch, but one of the most impactful was gaining visibility and control of our Amazon sales. This new level of control over our fulfillment actually helped us to harness the exposure we gained from Amazon to shine a light on our ecommerce site. We found that the minimal cost savings we realized by fulfilling through FBA were costing us the ability to pull our most effective growth levers. We saw that the very thing that we had been told was the key to success on Amazon (Prime status) might be limiting our business in the long-term. That’s when we went on the hunt for Amazon FBA alternatives and found that FBM opened us up to more possibilities than we had first realized.
You may already be seeing the limitations of FBA on your business but might be wary of dropping the Prime badge. Of course Amazon SFP will offer you the best of both worlds (Prime status and greater control), but if you’re either on the waitlist or don’t quite have the resources to build an SFP network to meet the new requirements, FBM is a viable option to kickstart ecommerce growth. Let’s talk about the main differences between Amazon FBA vs FBM and the changes we’ve seen in our business since making the switch.
One of the most important reasons we chose Amazon FBM vs FBA for our business was the ability to drive brand preference and send repeat customers to our ecommerce site, where we realize much higher margins and capture valuable re-targeting information. These were a few of the levers we pulled with our new fulfillment partner to direct Amazon shoppers to our ecommerce site, increase our AOV, and build lasting relationships with our customers.
So, did we see the 30% drop in Amazon sales that everyone told us we would if we would if we dropped the Prime badge? The short answer is no. The long answer is, not only did we continue to grow our Amazon sales, we more than doubled sales on our ecommerce site year over year. Those growth metrics were directly impacted by our decision to start looking for Amazon FBA alternatives to engage with our customers on a more meaningful level, and the growth is not slowing down. In February our ecommerce sales were 60% higher than January, and we’re on track to grow our Amazon sales by another 25%.
At the end of the day, you don’t have to let Amazon Prime tell you how you have to run your business. If you want to turn Amazon into a tool in your toolbox, FBM could be the first step. To really make FBM work for you, it’s pivotal to find a fulfillment partner that is strategically-minded and committed to your success when you’re looking for Amazon FBA alternatives. You need the flexibility to iterate, to test into new markets and strategies, and to flex your SKU profile when you need. What Amazon fulfillment offers in the way of speed and efficiency, it ultimately sacrifices on flexibility and scalability, and that could very well be standing in the way of your next big step forward.
Looking for an FBA alternative? Reach out to an Amazon fulfillment expert at Ware2Go.
There is no one-sized-fits-all answer to which fulfillment option is best for your business. FBA is a simple, low-touch solution for many Amazon sellers that enables Prime status. However, FBA’s inventory limits, slow inbounding process, and lack of visibility makes it a poor fit for some sellers. Many Amazon sellers choose to list two SKU’s und a single ASIN — one fulfilled by FBA and the other fulfilled by FBM. This gives them the option to switch between fulfillment methods in the case of a stockout on their FBA listing.
Looking for an FBA backup? Talk to one of our Amazon fulfillment experts.
FBA’s pricing structure highly favors small, lightweight products. Often, for products that Amazon classifies as “oversized” (weighing over 20 pounds or having any single side longer than 18 inches) FBA pricing can be very prohibitive. It’s best to compare prices between FBA and a 3PL or 4PL provider that can provide the same level of service.
Strategic sellers should also consider the value of having full visibility into their supply chain, access to customer data, and the ability to streamline multichannel fulfillment when weighing the cost of FBA vs FBM.
Sellers pay for storage, pick, pack, and ship services on FBA products in the form of an FBA Fulfillment Fee. The fee is calculated according to the item’s dimensions and the amount of time it has spent in storage.